The Emotion Regulation Strategies Scale is a 21-item self-reported measure of children’s methods for controlling anger and worry. Children complete a one-on-one interview to assess endorsement of emotion regulation strategies such as inhibition and expression using the 11-item Children’s Anger Management Scale (CAMS) and the 10-item Children’s Worry Management Scale (CWMS). All items are scored using a 3-point Likert scale (1 = hardly ever, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often). The CAMS is comprised of three subscales, Anger Inhibition (4 items; e.g., ‘‘I’m afraid to show my anger’’), Anger Dysregulated-Expression (3 items; e.g., ‘‘I do things like slam doors when I am mad’’), and Anger Regulation Coping (4 items; e.g., ‘‘I try to calmly deal with what is making me feel mad’’). The CWMS has three subscales that specify methods of regulating worry: Inhibition (the suppression of worry; 4 items; e.g., “I hide my worried feelings”), Dysregulation (exaggerated displays of worry; 3 items; e.g., “I keep whining about how worrried I am”), and Coping (constructive ways of managing worry; 3 items; e.g., “I keep myself from losing control of my worried feelings”).
The Emotion Regulation Strategies Scale is a self-reported measure of how children decrease their feelings of anger (Zeman, Shipman, & Penza-Clyve, 2001) and worry (Zeman, Cassano, Suveg, & Shipman, 2010). Emotion regulation in children is well established as a potential mechanism of behavior change. For example, greater dysregulated negative emotion (using anger items from the present scale) is associated with more subsequent aggressive behavior among adolescents (Herts, McLaughlin, & Hatzenbuehler, 2012), and greater reactivity to worry and anger is associated with increased eating behavior among children in second and third grade (Harrist, Hubbs-Tait, Topham, Shriver, & Page, 2013). Habitual use of different emotion regulation strategies should be studied as potential mechanisms of behavior change.
[+] PMCID, PUBMED ID, or CITATION
Text Citation: Zeman, J. L., Cassano, M., Suveg, C., & Shipman, K. (2010). Initial validation of the children’s worry management scale. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(4), 381-392.
Text Citation: Zeman, J., Shipman, K., & Penza-Clyve, S. (2001). Development and initial validation of the Children's Sadness Management Scale. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25(3), 187-205.
Text Citation: Harrist, A. W., Hubbs-Tait, L., Topham, G. L., Shriver, L. H., & Page, M. C. (2013). Emotion regulation is related to children's emotional and external eating. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 34(8), 557-565.
Text Citation: Herts, K. L., McLaughlin, K. A., & Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2012). Emotion dysregulation as a mechanism linking stress exposure to adolescent aggressive behavior. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 40(7), 1111-1122.
|ZemanCasssanoEtAl2010_WorryManagement.pdf Zeman2001_SadnessManagement.pdf EmotionDysregulation.Hertsetal.2012.pdf EmotionDysregulation.Harrist.2013.pdf|
This measure has not been measured yet.
This measure has not been influenced yet.
This measure has not been validated yet.
The Science of Behavior Change (SOBC) program seeks to promote basic research on the initiation, personalization and maintenance of behavior change. By integrating work across disciplines, this effort will lead to an improved understanding of the underlying principles of behavior change. The SOBC program aims to implement a mechanisms-focused, experimental medicine approach to behavior change research and to develop the tools required to implement such an approach. The experimental medicine approach involves: identifying an intervention target, developing measures to permit verification of the target, engaging the target through experimentation or intervention, and testing the degree to which target engagement produces the desired behavior change.
Within the SOBC Measures Repository, researchers have access to measures of mechanistic targets that have been (or are in the processing of being) validated by SOBC Research Network Members and other experts in the field. The SOBC Validation Process includes three important stages of evaluation for each proposed measure: Identification, Measurement, and Influence.
The first stage of validation requires a measure to be Identified within the field; there must be theoretical support for the specific measure of the proposed mechanistic target or potential mechanism of behavior change. This evidence may include references for the proposed measure, or theoretical support for the construct that the proposed measure is intended to assess. The second stage of validation requires demonstration that the level and change in level of the chosen mechanistic target can be Measured with the proposed measure (assay). For example, if the proposed measure is a questionnaire, the score on the measure should indicate the activity of the target process, and it must have strong psychometric properties. The third stage of validation requires demonstration that the measure can be Influenced; there must be evidence that the measured target is malleable and responsive to manipulation. Evidence relating to each stage includes at least one peer-reviewed publication or original data presentation (if no peer-reviewed research is available to support the claim) and is evaluated by SOBC Research Network Members and experts in the field.
Once a measure has gone through these three stages, it will then either be Validated or Not validated according to SOBC Research Network standards. If a measure is Validated, then change in the measured target was reliably associated with Behavior Change. If a measure is Not validated, then change in the measured target was not reliably associated with Behavior Change. Why would we share measures that are not validated? The SOBC Research Network values open, rigorous, and transparent research. Our goal is to make meaningful progress and develop replicable and effective interventions in behavior change science. Therefore, the SOBC sees value in providing other researchers in the field with information regarding measures that work and measures that fall short for specific targets. Further, a measure that is not validated for one target in one population may be validated in another target or population.
Want to learn more? For any questions regarding the SOBC Validation Process or Measures Repository, please email email@example.com.
Has the mechanism been identified as a potential target for behavior change? This section summarizes theoretical support for the mechanism.
Have the psychometric properties of this measure been assessed? This section includes information such as content validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.
Has a study manipulation led to change in the mechanism? This section addresses evidence that this measure is modifiable by experimental manipulation or clinical intervention.
Has a change in this mechanism been associated with behavior change? This section addresses empirical evidence that causing change in the measure reliably produces subsequent behavior change.